The Corvette recently received a complete redesign. Not one bolt from the C6 was used for the C7, even the logo was redone. This new offering from Chevy brought back the Stingray name, dropped in 1976. The C7 has quite a bit more power than the old one thanks to it's brand new 6.2L LT1. This engine produces 455HP and 460 lb/ft of torque. The previous car only made 430HP in base form and 424 lb/ft of torque. As the old C6 makes due with a 6 speed transmission the new one gets 7. The interior got better quality materials and new programmable digital gauges. Corvettes of old were almost entirely fiberglass. The new Stingray has several body panels now made from carbon fiber. The suspension now employs GM's new optional magnetic ride control. Chevy also recently launched the convertible version and stated that there will be a Z06 version debuting in 2015.
Griffin
I've recently become a big Corvette guy. At my house we have an '01 C5 and a '70 C3. So this new one really intrigued me. My favorite part of the whole car is obviously the new LT1. I'm glad hey stuck with an old style pushrod V8. I will say, big props to the chassis and suspension guys. This is supposed to be the best handling Corvette yet. I think 7 speeds are a bit too many. I was happy with 6. The rev-matching on the Tremec 7 speed is pretty cool though, I have to admit. Unfortunately I didn't have enough time to give this car justice, but I will do a way more in depth write up of the Z06 when it hits the showroom floor.
Connor
Image sources:
http://image.motortrend.com/f/roadtests/convertibles/1307_2014_chevrolet_corvette_stingray_z51_first_test/51840922/2014-Chevrolet-Corvette-Stingray-Z51-burnout-02.jpg
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/10/chevrolet-gen-v-small-block-v8.jpg
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
2015 Ford Expedition
Griffin:
I felt like I needed to do a piece on this thing because my current daily driver is a 2000 Expedition. The old truck is a gutless waterbed, but it did have great torque and the modular V8 is reliable as hell. Call me old school, but I like a V8 in my truck. As far as the chassis is concerned, this truck has a body shell and frame dating back to 1996. Both mine and Connor’s girlfriends are one year older than this thing! Ford, design a new Expedition please. A full-size six cylinder SUV is going to be a really hard sell with the Tahoe and Durango offering V8’s. I’m not saying they shouldn’t put the 3.5 in it at all. I just think they should make the 5.0 and option like they have with the F150. This will probably happen after the first year of this when they realize no one is buying these. They claim that the six will give improved fuel economy. In the F150 the 3.5 gives 16-22 mpg. The only problem is that it’s having to work it’s ass off and as a result gets barely better fuel economy over what the outgoing V8 made which was 14-20 mpg. In my opinion, ever since Ford introduced the European Mondeo as the new Fusion, things have been going downhill at Ford as far as styling and mechanical ideas. Ford, at this point, is playing the tech game. If you want a car with a sync system (which is terrible) or want to be able to hook every electronic device you own to your car, get a Ford. If you want something fun to drive get a GM, Mopar, or import. I used to like the big three in this order: Mopar, Ford, Chevy. Now I’m way more of a Chevy guy than a Ford guy.
Connor:
Image sources:
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
2014 Toyota Tundra
The previous generation of Toyota Tundra has been with us now for nine years, which is a long time for one model to remain unchanged. Toyota revamped their large truck this year with mostly just a facelift and some other small changes. Underneath the chassis is the same from the previous generation as is the entire drivetrain, brakes, suspension, and all other mechanical components. Even the electronic options remain the same from previous generations. The Tundra did receive new exterior styling, added front end trim with a larger, bolder grille. Interior styling has changed mildly as well. The new version is also cheaper too. The base model is a few more dollars than the old one at $26,200 versus $25,455. As you go up the range they do get cheaper with the top of the line 2014 being $47,600 and the 2013 going up to $48,170. There is a lot less to say about this truck than most other new cars because this is an example of an automotive facelift.
Griffin
This thing is a giant turd. There’s a few reasons why I think that. First of all Toyota is claiming this is an entirely new generation when all of the guts of it are straight off the shelf from the previous model. Secondly, at this point they’re asking $26,200 for a 10 year old truck.Thirdly, it makes no more power, has no new tech, and retains a frame that has more give than bleeding heart libs.Lastly, I never thought the truck was that attractive to begin with and the amount of chrome on this one would be appalling in the ‘50s. The only upside I can see to this is that since it is a Toyota, and as long as the seat heaters don’t turn it into a massive fireball, it should hold it’s value well. Also all the aftermarket suspension and engine parts that are already out should bolt right in. Assuming owning a dude-bro rig is your thing.
Connor
I am an Engineering student, and I have had so much work on my plate that I have literally not even had the time to drop in my two cents on thrown rods. But this vehicle deserves a pause in my studies, because... well look at it. I am fueled up on so much caffeine and stress that it only serves to fuel my hatred of this truck. Because of the fact that this truck is the same model it's always been, I would like to say that, Toyota, you infuriate me. I drive a Honda, not out of desire, but out of necessity. It is a mid size sedan- the bane of my existence, but also probably the most popular category of car on the road. Anyone who has been in front of this truck at night realizes that it is impossible not to be blinded by this vehicle. Anyone who has driven this vehicle at night realizes it is impossible to see at all with the headlights. I am so confused by that. And more. Working on these things is a terrible experience- the engineers (if there were any) probably had a game of who could make their part contain the absolute least common sense and last the shortest amount of time. Okay, to be really fair, they are relatively reliable. But come on, Toyota. You already missed one new truck generation. Don't set yourselves up to miss another.
I am an Engineering student, and I have had so much work on my plate that I have literally not even had the time to drop in my two cents on thrown rods. But this vehicle deserves a pause in my studies, because... well look at it. I am fueled up on so much caffeine and stress that it only serves to fuel my hatred of this truck. Because of the fact that this truck is the same model it's always been, I would like to say that, Toyota, you infuriate me. I drive a Honda, not out of desire, but out of necessity. It is a mid size sedan- the bane of my existence, but also probably the most popular category of car on the road. Anyone who has been in front of this truck at night realizes that it is impossible not to be blinded by this vehicle. Anyone who has driven this vehicle at night realizes it is impossible to see at all with the headlights. I am so confused by that. And more. Working on these things is a terrible experience- the engineers (if there were any) probably had a game of who could make their part contain the absolute least common sense and last the shortest amount of time. Okay, to be really fair, they are relatively reliable. But come on, Toyota. You already missed one new truck generation. Don't set yourselves up to miss another.
Wednesday, February 5, 2014
2014 Cadillac ATS
Hello everyone. Today we’re going to talk about a car that Connor and I actually like.It’s the new Cadillac ATS.
Cadillac’s new small sedan has been out on the market since August of 2012, so it’s hardly brand new anymore. The reason we want to write about it is because this is an important car for General Motors and it’s really well made. The car is based on the rear wheel and all wheel drive GM Alpha platform. to give you an idea of what this platform is under, the current CTS is and the 2015 Camaro will be based on it. This car strays way away from the Cadillacs of old. This new car is surprisingly light at around 3,400 pounds thanks to lots of new lightweight materials. This is the first Cadillac since the Cimarron of the late ‘80s which has four cylinders and trust me, it’s way better. This new car actually has 3 available engines. the base model gets a naturally aspirated 2.5L four pot making 202hp and 190lbft of torque. The top of the line gets the same 3.6L V6 you get in the Camaro with 321hp and 274lbft of torque. Both of these models are auto trans cars only. That’s why we like the middle child. GM made this car for enthusiasts by fitting it with an optional six speed manual and a 272hp turbo 2.0L four cylinder. The torque curve on this car is impressive for a small capacity four cylinder, making 260lbft. You can have either of the upper range cars with all wheel drive.The car handles great due to the engineers giving it a near 50/50 weight distribution across the lineup. The interior and tech in this car all works well. You get a wide arrange of options on the ATS. One of which is the touchscreen CUE system which controls just about everything in the car. Prices start at $33,065 and can reach 58,760 if you check all of the boxes. That means this car, for the quality and performance, is actually a pretty fair deal. Especially if you consider the BMW 3 series, the ATS’s main competition, which to get the same performance you would be looking at spending upwards of $40,000. The styling on the ATS is in the same chiseled gothic look the company has had for a while. They have updated the company look rather well and it has a very clean design. All around it’s a solid entry for that price bracket.
Griffin
I really didn’t take too much notice to this when it first came out. I was way more into the CTS-V, and still really am. The ATS is cool though. It’s a small Caddy that will handle and that’s something I can really get behind. The turbo four they put in it is really a fun motor and I like it, but I’m waiting for someone to do a LSA swap from a CTS-V in it. I will forever back cars that come out with three pedals because they’re always more fun and I don’t like paddle shifters because I’m old school. The touch screen stuff isn’t my bag but GM’s system seems to work better than Ford’s. I’m glad Cadillac went with a rear wheel drive platform instead of front wheel like they have so much in the past. All in all I really dig the ATS and I’m looking forward to the coupe.
Connor
Sorry guys. I am busy with school and don’t have time to post stuff. Come back later to see what I think of the ATS.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)